This post will discuss soemthing that a paper has already done in full — however, some conclusions about this paper’s result means that I will re-cover what it did, and make a different argument. That paper is Krause et al. [1]
This is a tale of two taxa, Majungasaurus crenatissimus [2] and Majungatholus atopus [3]. The first was discovered at the Maeverano region on western Madagascar in the 1890′s, while the latter was discovered a bit afterward. Both are likely to be the same animal, as covered in [1], and this argument is not to rehash that or dispute it.
Posted by Jaime A. Headden