A Cretaceous Parrot?


UCMP 143274, Stidham's Cretaceous "parrot." Schematic views top left and both left and right, drawing in lateral view in top left. From top to bottom, left to right: dorsal view, left lateral view, ventral view, medial (lingual) view from the lateral side. Missing margins are dotted in.

Stidham (1998) described the above fossil, a fragment of fused dentaries, from a find in the Hell Creek Formation of Wyoming, USA, as a potential morphologically modern psittaciform mandible. This jaw is remarkably parrot-like:

Mandible of the yellow-crowned Amazon, Amazona ochrocephala. Schematic view in dorsal view on left, drawing in side view on left.

Stidham was relatively careful in his description, positively comparing the material to lorries, which unlike the parrot above, have a much lower, longer jaw. But Gareth Dyke and Gerald Mayr (1999) disagreed, arguing that morphologically primitive psittaciforms from the Eocene and Miocene were far more primitive-looking than the UCMP mandible, presuming that the morphology was convergent. Instead, they suggested it might be similar to caenagnathid oviraptorosaur theropods.

Mandibles of caenagnathids from Dinosaur Park Formation. A, NMC 8776, holotype of Caenagnathus collinsi Sternberg, 1932; B, RTMP 92.36.390; C, RTMP 91.144.1. After Currie, Godfey and Nessov, 1994.

If Stidham (1998) is right, and he merely suggested similarities (including a series of vascular channels similar to lories), the jaw represents a possible psittaciform convergent on modern forms predating the appearance of modern-jaws parrots and lories by over 50ma. Convergence is likely even when Dyke and Mayr’s (1999) comments are considered, and as such, finding other morphological features to affirm the identity of this tiny jaw would be very useful.

A strong comparison to caenagnathids is inevitable, as to any oviraptorosaur (I am surprised the authors did not directly compare to the shorter, broader jaws of oviraptorids, but this would be problematic anyway, as no oviraptorid jaw is fused at the dentary symphysis; this feature only occurs in caenagnathid mandibles and in the jaw of the Uzbek Caenagnathasia martinsoni (Currie =, Godfrey and Nessov, 1994)).

Caenagnathasia martinsoni Currie, Godfrey & Nessov, 1994. Mandibles of the holotype CMGP 401/12457 (left) and paratype CMGP 402/12457 (right). Mandibles in dorsal view, ventral view, and right lateral view. Paratype is copied, flipped and paired with the original on the right side.

I have my general doubts about a caenagnathid identity, largely based on the degree of gracility in the UCMP specimen, and that nearly all caenagnathid mandibles show detailed ridges and nodules ornamenting the surface. However, avian affinities cannot easily be ruled out, especially if the jaw is from a derived avialan such as a confuciusornithid- or Apsaravis-like bird, both of which are edentulous. If the jaw is nonavian, it is also unlikely to be a nondianosaurian reptile, as the morphology of crocodilians with edentulous regions of their jaws are far different, especially in the absence of fusion between both dentaries, and the extension of the distinct splenial into the intermandibular suture. As these are not apparent, the jaw is probably from a theropod (avian or not).

The entertaining premise, though, and one that may be far likelier than Stidham’s in some respects, is that this does, in fact, represent a caenagnathid or at least an oviraptorosaur or ornithomimosaur. The jaw fragment is around 15mm long, and is thus  particularly tiny: if it were a caenagnathid mandible, it was from a very, very small animal — the complete jaw would be close to around 3.5 cm in length, and imply an animal around .4m, barely 14in, long. Intriguing jaw, nonetheless.

Currie, P. J., Godfrey, S. J. & Nessov, L. A. 1994. New caenagnathid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) specimens from the Upper Cretaceous of North America and Asia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences — Revue canadienne de Sciences de la terre 30(10-11):2255-2272.
Dyke, G.J. & Mayr, G. 1999. Did parrots exist in the Cretaceous period?. Nature 399:317-318.
Stidham T. 1998. A lower jaw from a Cretaceous parrot. Nature 396:29-30.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Paleontology and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A Cretaceous Parrot?

  1. Pingback: A Few Things About Oviraptorosaurs | The Bite Stuff

  2. Pingback: Reconstruction Deconstruction | The Bite Stuff

  3. Pingback: Anzū is Here | The Bite Stuff

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s